On Fri, 05 Oct 2012, Don Armstrong wrote: > From what I understand, nm and wicd are not capable of > co-existing.[1] Furthermore, nm does not always catch that other > systems (such as ifupdown) are configuring the interfaces, and may > lead to broken behavior on upgrade (such as #656584 and #688355, > just glancing at it).
Assuming that 1) we decide that failures of NM to detect basic ifupdown configurations and avoid overriding them are bugs, possibly of RC severity 2) given the gnome maintainer's desire to have NM installed by default from the gnome metapackage allowing gnome to Depends: nm | wicd; would deal with the most concerning form of breakage for me. Does this work for anyone else? Don Armstrong -- It was a very familiar voice. [...] It was a voice you could have used to open a bottle of whine. -- Terry Pratchett _The Last Continent_ p270 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121011011852.gb7...@teltox.donarmstrong.com