]] Don Armstrong > Right; I think we definitely should integrate many of the components > that are being developed. I'm just concerned that the > component<->systemd interface is still changing, and because the > codebase is integrated, there's less of a requirement to communicate and > document what that interface is than there would be if they were > distinct projects.
If it's covered by the interface stability promise, it's stable. If it's marked as an internal interface, well, then it's an internal interface. I believe interfaces will over time move towards being under the stability interface promise. Which and how fast is something that can influenced based on what's needed. > This concern isn't very strong, but it was piqued when udev development > was brought into systemd; I'm still not certain why that was necessary. Circular build deps was the initial reason cited upstream. -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/m2txep7hw0....@rahvafeir.err.no