Steve Langasek <vor...@debian.org> writes:
> However, I think this gets to the heart of why upstart upstream has avoided
> ever recommending the use of socket-based activation. There are some fairly
> fundamental problems that basically halted development of socket-based
> activation in upstart (beyond merging of Scott's original implementation,
> which is rudimentary, as has been noted), and a look at systemd usage on
> Fedora led me to believe that systemd had not overcome these problems at
> all.
[...]
I really hope that you wrote this email (and a few other recent ones)
with your upstart maintainer hat on, and not your ctte member hat.
Unless I have missed something, pretty much all the statements you have
made (in a rather confrontational and certain tone) about systemd in
this mail have been refuted. It seems that you have misunderstood some
important parts of the systemd architecture, and instead of asking
anyone to clarify, you went on to construct contra-systemd arguments
from them.
That can happen, and I am pretty sure that I have done the same. In my
opinion, however, this is not acceptable from a ctte member who is
expected to make a decision about the better init system for Debian as a
whole.
I do not believe that being the upstart maintainer disqualifies you from
making this decision as a ctte member. I believe, however, that it
places a special responsibility on you to be especially diligent in your
research on systemd. Being the upstart maintainer means you have twice
as much time available to learn about systemd (every other ctte member
needs to split his time between upstart and systemd), and it means that
you have to work extra hard to obtain at least a roughly comparable
familiarity with both systemd and upstart.
>From your emails thus far, it does not look as if you have done
this. Quite the contrary, I have the impression that you are using your
familiarity with upstart as a reason to not investigate systemd in much
depth.
To put a long story short, I hope you are going to spend some more time
on systemd before casting a vote.
Thanks for considering, and happy new year!
Best,
-Nikolaus
--
Encrypted emails preferred.
PGP fingerprint: 5B93 61F8 4EA2 E279 ABF6 02CF A9AD B7F8 AE4E 425C
»Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/874n5ml05g....@rath.org
