Moritz Muehlenhoff dixit: >FreeBSD upstream isn't a desktop OS and never will be, there're just too >many deficiencies (e.g. lack of dbus
Eh, excuse me! It’s obviously possible to run a desktop without dbus! In fact, this is a feature, in my eyes. >limited hardware support Oh c’mon. Linux does not support any and all hardware either. >only OSS sound drivers I fail to see where the problem is with this. >limited KMS/3D support in Xorg As if that were not the case in Linux. Its support may be a bit broader but still limited. Sorry, but this is FUD. bye, //mirabilos -- [...] if maybe ext3fs wasn't a better pick, or jfs, or maybe reiserfs, oh but what about xfs, and if only i had waited until reiser4 was ready... in the be- ginning, there was ffs, and in the middle, there was ffs, and at the end, there was still ffs, and the sys admins knew it was good. :) -- Ted Unangst über *fs -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/pine.bsm.4.64l.1401171627270.23...@herc.mirbsd.org
