El Sat, 8 de Feb 2014 a las 3:56 PM, Michael Gilbert
<mgilb...@debian.org> escribió:
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Paul Tagliamonte wrote:
I understand you think that, and I empathize, but I disagree.
The fact is, I have limited time. If I'm going to focus on making a
bigger impact with my work, I'm going to stick to dealing with
issues
that effect the most users.
I don't care about the init system all that much, in the end, it's
not
important. I do care about ensuring we have something maintainable
and
stable.
Why bring such a controversial and polarizing issue before the TC if
the outcome doesn't matter much to you?
sysvinit is maintainable and stable, so why seek to change it?
Perhaps the movement in GNOME to depend on a number of systemd provided
interfaces has led Paul to believe that sysvinit is unmaintainable?
AFAIR, systemd-shim was not available when he presented the question to
the TC (or am I mistaken?).
--
Cameron
