On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, Ansgar Burchardt wrote: > Don Armstrong <d...@debian.org> writes: > > Speaking personally, without specific patches which have been discussed > > with the maintainers of the init package and well tested, I'm unlikely > > to vote any resolution on this issue above FD. > > Does this include the "no change is required" option?
I don't think we have such an option even proposed. [Or even, any options.] I'd probably be OK with an option which punted back to maintainers to figure things out in the absence of real options. That's technically no different than FD, but maybe effectively different. > I would prefer if we did not end in perpetual further discussion until > the freeze is over. I don't think using CTTE powers to try to prejudge something like this for all un-proposed options is acceptable. Further discussion may be annoying, but even if the CTTE were to decide, we'd still be discussing. -- Don Armstrong http://www.donarmstrong.com Debian's not really about the users or the software at all. It's a large flame-generating engine that the cabal uses to heat their coffee -- Andrew Suffield (#debian-devel Fri, 14 Feb 2003 14:34 -0500) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-ctte-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141120172745.gr4...@teltox.donarmstrong.com