>>>>> "josh" == josh <j...@joshtriplett.org> writes:
josh> That's not a bad plan, actually. The three standard options josh> could be, in effect, "preliminary injunction against the josh> maintainer to avoid immediate harm, but we still need to talk josh> about this more", "dismissed as completely inappropriate to josh> have taken to the TC at all", or "we need further discussion josh> before we can even offer an opinion". Sure, and I'd also argue that someone on the TC should believe that an option other than FD should win before holding a vote. We don't need more process for process's sake. But having something like this in place and an understanding on the TC that if k TC members (probably k = 1) feel this is reasonable calling for such a vote is a fine thing to do. --Sam