On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 09:48:02AM +0200, Vincent Bernat wrote: > ❦ 5 octobre 2016 22:49 CEST, Philip Hands <p...@hands.com> : > > > If you fancy explaining what you think browserified means w.r.t. the > > Jison stuff, go ahead of course. That might at least help to focus the > > discussion a bit. Just don't feel obliged to because I said so. > > The libjs-handlebars issue has little to share with browserified > JS. Browserified JS is usually just concatenated JS. Here, there is an > equivalent of flex/bison involved. That's quite unusual and is more a > build process. If the TC rules over this issue, it should drop the > "browserified" part. Otherwise, a negative answer would also apply to > more basic packages. >...
Why is Grunt such a blocker here? If I understand it correctly, Grunt is a powerful build system that can do a gazillion different things and has many dependencies. For the basic browserified JS case, could a much simpler tool like node-browserify-lite produce the same output? cu Adrian -- "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days. "Only a promise," Lao Er said. Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed