On 08/06/22 at 21:07 +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> I think I take more issue with non-dgit git-first workflows than with
> dgit ones, because dgit is so well documented and is a workflow that is
> already shared by a noticeable fraction of the archive.

I'm curious: how do you measure dgit usage?

You cannot just look at the list of repositories at
https://browse.dgit.debian.org/, since that just says that at some point
in the past, someone used dgit to work on that package, right?
For example, the keepass2 package has a repo there, but it is completely
outdated compared to what is in unstable.

Lucas

Reply via email to