Hello, On Thu 16 Jun 2022 at 08:47am +02, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > Indeed, and I do agree that 4c is such a clear statement. I would like > to see a stronger statement here, but Sam et al. tried to gain consensus > on that and there wasn't. So the CTTE advice probably shouldn't override > that non-consensus. That makes 4c a lot more of an attractive option to > me. Finally, the main conflicting parties in this issue (oversimplified) > were Lucas and Ian, so if 4c is strong enough for Lucas, that's good as > well. > > I hereby withdraw my intention to extend the ballot as sent by Sean on > June 7th. > > Thanks for bearing with me and bringing those arguments forward. Cool, thanks for reviewing and confirming that. -- Sean Whitton