I agree with the conclusions drawn here, but feel that it's possibly worth making a stronger general statement that policy should never prevent the implementation of a well-considered simple solution. I would like some further analysis of Sam's proposal, though - I don't think there's any advantage in undoing the existing solution, but if it would work then it's maybe a more straightforward solution for any similar issues in future?
- Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice on gl... Simon McVittie
- Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice ... Christoph Berg
- Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting adv... Simon McVittie
- Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice ... Helmut Grohne
- Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting adv... Sam Hartman
- Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting adv... Stefano Rivera
- Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice ... Simon McVittie
- Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting adv... Simon McVittie
- Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting adv... Simon McVittie
- Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice ... Simon McVittie
- Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting advice ... Matthew Garrett
- Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting adv... Sam Hartman
- Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Requesting... Simon McVittie
- Bug#1065170: tech-ctte: Reques... Matthew Garrett
- Bug#1065170: marked as done (tech-ctte: Re... Debian Bug Tracking System