[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin F. Krafft) wrote on 07.07.01 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> also sprach Steve M. Robbins (on Sat, 07 Jul 2001 04:08:21PM -0400): > > Err, my point is that "kilo" is properly abbreviated by "k", > > but not by "K". > > > > See, e.g. <http://www.alcpress.com/tutorials/units/prefix-decimal.htm>. > > with which i disagree. read my other post. and i am digging out my > sources... Well, if you disagree, then you're simply wrong. Small k is the SI abbreviation for kilo. Period. Nothing to debate here, it's defined that way. You might as well disagree with 2+2=4. (So 1 kK is 726.85�C.) MfG Kai
