On Tue, Aug 21, 2001 at 10:37:29AM -0400, Mike Dresser wrote:
> I think we need a libnylon, libleather, libpolyester, libcotton, etc..
>
> Oh, and a libcotton, would rely on a libcottonpress, no?
Oh my, we are getting into a Windoze-type DLL hell now. How about a simplier
library such as libcloth? It can have the appropriate API for each type. By
making the library extensible other types like silk, linen, rayon, etc. can
easily be added.
I suppose it have cleaning instructions as part of it (dry clean, cold
water only, etc.) or these be better in a separate libwash?
bob
--
bob billson email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ham: kc2wz
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Linux geek /)
"N�l aon tinte�n mar do thinte�n f�in." beekeeper -8|||}
--Dorothy \)
