On Tuesday 15 October 2002 00:54, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Yven Leist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.10.15.0025 +0200]: > > I am absolutely facsinated about how well spamassasin works as well, the > > only thing I found a bit cumbersome is the fact that I had to tweak the > > scoring quite a bit, since for instance a score of -1 for an > > X_MAILING_LIST header doesn't really make much sense if you receive the > > majority of spam through debian lists ;-) > > i never changed anything and i'd say it's 99.9% accurate. currently it > is missing some spams, but it's only getting 1-2 false positives per > month, and i receive about 3000 emails a day.
ok, I really cannot come up with any similarly impressing numbers, so your argument has to remain unchallenged ;-) I guess what it boils down to is simply personal preference, since by tweaking the scores I managed to get the number of misses down to zero, at the expense of some false positives; and I'm actually perfectly happy with that as there have never been really important mails among them. cheers, Yven -- Yven Johannes Leist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.leist.beldesign.de
