> > now that i'm having a look at cdd-install-helper, i've seen that every > > <dep>.txt on the documentation dir gets an entry on the menu, even if > > there's already a "manual" entry (one handwritten on the menu dir). > Do you mean by "manual" an entry you created in your ~/.menu directory? > that's right :)
> > But i also noticed that no .html can appear on the menu as .txt do. > Currently not but perhaps it would be the best idea to switch completely > to html. > well, IMHO it would be better to have both options [...] > > Anyway, i've noticed that you are using pager to see the txt's, but it > might > > be better to use sensible-pager instead of pager, as the former lets the > > user define the PAGER variable, and the other uses debian's alternatives > > system (only ~modifiable~ - is this the correct spelling? - by root, i > > think), and the same could go to sensible-editor vs. view (why use view > > instead of pager when the hint is different from the title? in my system > > view is vim) and (maybe) sensible-browser vs. www-browser. > I put this onto the TODO list. It's a good idea. > great! Now onto the other mail i sent to Andreas :) Is there any plan to add Gnome/KDE menu systems support? Dont't know, as i see there could be 2 possible options: - Use separated files for each menu (one for Debian's menu, one for Gnome and another for KDE), each one on it's own format (maybe on dirs 'menu', 'menu-gnome' and 'menu-kde' ...) - Use a "standard" format and translate each entry to every "particular" format (so only one menu file should be written and all three could be automatically generated by cdd-dev) What do you think? Read you -- +++ Jetzt WLAN-Router f�r alle DSL-Einsteiger und Wechsler +++ GMX DSL-Powertarife zudem 3 Monate gratis* http://www.gmx.net/dsl
