On Fri, Jan 28, 2000 at 06:39:00PM +0000, David Starner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2000 at 06:27:30PM +0100, Thomas Köhler wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2000 at 05:15:28PM +0000, > > Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Is 47718 critical? 4194303 blocks is one K less than 4G. As on 32bit > > > platforms we can currently only support 2G files (actually 1 byte less > > > than > > > 2G) does it matter that we can only set a quota of 4G? > > > > Users may use multiple files to hit the quota... > > Still, it's an inconvienance, not a critical failure. If it can't be fixed > quickly, document it and move on for now.
This is true for several bugs, not only this special case. I've seen several not-so-critical bugs marked as "release critical" in the past, and there surely will be such bugs in the future. It would be better to assign a lower severity sometimes... CU, Thomas -- Thomas Köhler Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] | LCARS - Linux <>< WWW: http://jeanluc-picard.de | for Computers IRC: jeanluc | on All Real PGP public key available from Homepage! | Starships