On Thursday 13 January 2005 15:25, Daniel Macêdo Batista wrote: > Em 9/1/2005, "Jeroen van Wolffelaar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu: > > Meanwhile, I agree mail is important. What address(es) exactly are > > failing? It looks like [EMAIL PROTECTED] and webmaster@ etc are all > > deliverd to a group of people. A number of other addresses are fed into > > scripts, I could look into that, but don't know what exactly is failing > > or how it is supposed to work. > > The address with problems is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
it seems that the problems with [EMAIL PROTECTED] aren't resolved just yet.
However, if you use [EMAIL PROTECTED] instead, the server sends out
replies. You'll get the normal feedback, and it looks like the processing
of incoming mails succeeds.
Cheers,
--
Tobias
Early to bed and early to rise and you'll
be groggy when everyone else is wide awake.
pgpzXdLvv26so.pgp
Description: PGP signature
