Once we decide on a package naming standard, we should tell the rest of the free software world what it is and encourage the upstream maintainers to stick to that format.
Tell them without asking for comments? :-) [What was that about committees?] I lean towards Bill Mitchell's idea. [1] it matches prior discussions on the subject [2] less entropy in dumb conversion to msdos [3] minimal effort to bring packages into conformance -- Raul (70 unread messages remaining)