On 04 Sep 2000, Brian Mays <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Not quite. The FHS briefly mentions *System V's* runlevel 2 and 3 > (along with Berkley's multiuser state). It does not specify anything > about runlevels for Linux or any other OS.
O.k., you're right - it was on linuxbase.org. Which we support, according to their main-page. And there is this linked from there: <http://www.debian.org/Lists-Archives/lsb-spec-9904/msg00005.html> .----- quote ----- | ------- start of cut text -------------- | 0 halt | 1 single user mode | 2 multiuser with no remote networking | 3 normal/full multiuser | 4 reserved for local use, default is normal/full multiuser | 5 xdm or equivalent | 6 reboot | ------- end ---------------------------- `----- quote ----- So, I'm asking, why we don't follow this guidelines? I don't see any contradiction with our current approach to leave it up to the user. That won't interfer IMHO, for the update-rc script (or what ever it's called) doesn't touch the links if any of them exists, right? So the user can still change 'em to her/his likes. Now, are we part of the linuxbase-project or aren't we? I know that it's not good to take everything without asking it - but the current setup is somewhat nonsense to me - 4 runlevels with the same setup.... Just a thought. Alfie -- Die meisten Menschen pflegen im Kindesalter vom Zeigen auf Gegenstände (Mausbewegung) und "ga" sagen (Mausklick) abzukommen, zugunsten eines mächtigeren und langwierig zu erlernenden Tools (Sprache). -- Achim Linder in de.comp.os.linux.misc -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]