On 00-09-12 Daniel Kobras wrote:
> On 11 Sep 2000, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
> > >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Kobras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > Daniel> On 10 Sep 2000, Karl M. Hegbloom wrote:
> > >> `scsh' ought to be taken over by someone who actually uses it. I've
> > >> not even looked at it in over a year.
> >
> > Daniel> If nobody objects I'd like to do this together with Martin
> > Daniel> Gasbichler who wrote a fair part of scsh 0.6. But me
> > Daniel> having just applied for Debian maintainership this will
> > Daniel> take some time...
> >
> > I also have an adoption offer from Georg Bauer (Cc'd), who I
> > responded to on the attached message, telling him that if he contacts
> > the new maintainer team and has a working `scsh' package, he can have
> > it.
> >
> > Since you are teaming with Martin Gasbichler, and since Martin is a
> > co-author of Scsh, I'd say that puts you two in as most qualified to
> > handle the package. (Daniel? Please forward this mail to Martin.)
> >
> > Perhaps the three of you could team? What do you all think?
> Sounds good to me. Martin is on vacation for a couple of days but I'm sure
> we can work out a scheme everyone's confident with as soon as he's
> back. The big problem IMHO however being that neither of us is registered
> as a developer so far. I'd be happy to work on debs for a recent version
> of scsh but we'd really need some maintainer to adopt the package until my
> appliance gets through.
You don't need a package maintainer to adopt the package for getting a
new package uploaded. A sponsor for you and Martin would be enough to
upload the package to the archive. Do you already are in the NM-Queue
(nm.debian.org)?
Ciao
Christian
--
Ein "Nein" ausgesprochen mit der tiefsten Überzeugung ist besser
und größer als ein "Ja" um zu gefallen oder noch schlimmer, um
Schwierigkeiten zu umgehen.
-- Mahatma Gandhi
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
