On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 10:05:26AM -0400, Raul Miller wrote: ...sigh.
Exhibit A: > On Mon, 11 Sep 2000, erik wrote: > [lots of stuff deleted -- basically a bitch about new maintainer] > > On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 07:57:41AM -0400, Christopher C. Chimelis wrote: > > Good point :-) > > Not really: > > [1] This point (if it really erik's point -- hard to tell) is > not well expressed by erik's subject line, and was not well expressed > in any of erik's original posts. Even the current post is way to > verbose to be worth quoting. > > [2] New Maintainer is a tough job, with a lot of work to be done > (especially because we weren't processing applications at all, last > year, because things had gotten so out of hand and the people dealing > with it had gotten so stressed out). In spite of that, NM is processing > people at a fairly decent rate (and most of the people who haven't been > processed haven't had their identities confirmed, yet). > > > Not to stir anything up, here, but, to the NM team, what exactly is "the > > process" for dealing with NM applications? > > Please read: http://nm.debian.org > > -- > Raul > Oh well, at least nobody can say, "Well, nobody ever said anything ... ". I tried. Regards, Erik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]