Hi.
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
on Fri, 29 Dec 2000 01:50:36 +1100,
on Re: test -d /usr/man && mail [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Hamish Moffatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 28, 2000 at 09:13:32AM -0500, Chad Miller wrote:
> > I noticed that the FHS2.1 doesn't have /usr/man -- only /usr/share/man.
> > On this box, there are...
> >
> [...]
> >
> > ...several packages that install stuff in /usr/man . Do these warrant bug
> > reports?
>
> Yep, IMHO. We should be FHS compliant by now, there's been plenty of time.
The CTTE recommendation, or DPL order, was that the woody has
the symlinks from /usr/man/<pakcage> to /usr/share/man/<package>, IIRC.
Is this changed now ? Can we drop the postinst/prerm requirements
to create/remove those symlinks ?
--
Taketoshi Sano: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
