On Wed, Jan 03, 2001 at 09:07:27PM -0900, Ethan Benson wrote: > in that case there would be something funny going on, here is my > theory: > > you post to list, you M-F-To: is set to only the list > > someone (Mr-Broken) with broken mailer uses reply-to-all which CCs you > anyway ignoring M-F-To. > > mutt user uses list-reply to Mr-Broken's post, mutt sees you were CCed > and assumes you should be included since there is no M-F-To header. > mutt then sets the M-F-To header to include you for the benifit of > later list-replies.
How about having the mailing list software add M-F-To headers to mails that do not have it and do not have Reply-To, filling it with the mailing list only? Might help at least some of the cases. - Adi Stav