Scott Ellis wrote: > Of course the -I option to tar was completely non-standard. The changelog > explains why it changed, to be consistant with Solaris tar. I'd prefer > portability and consistancy any day, it shouldn't take that long to change > any custom scripts you have. I always use long options for nonstandard > commands when building scripts anyway :)
Well, ok, I didn't know about Solaris tar. Probably, they are right then, but nevertheless, it is a pain. Maybe there should be a debconf text message, priority low, that informs the user about it if Debconf is installed? Roland -- Roland Bauerschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>