* Manoj Srivastava | You missed the point by a lot. OK, here it is all speeled out:
No, I didn't. I told you that gnus has a way around it. Which isn't perfect, but quite good. And of course it's a hack and a workaround - I am not saying that setting reply-to on a mailing list is the correct thing to do. | a) I have a reply-to header to allow people to actually respond to | me, rather than the strange lab set up my laptop happens to be a | part of | b) some idiot destroys the reply-to header by scribbling all over it, | so my hand crafted reply to information is now lost. | | Pray tell, how is your Gnus going to recreate that information | that was lost? It can't. As I wrote, it's quite good, but not able to guess about information. However, it should probably look at the X-Reply-To header, if present (which at least Mailman renames the reply-to header if it does reply-to munging). | You may also consider | a) looking at the X-Mailer header in in this and other messages from | me, and | b) Look at the maintainer field of the Gnus package. Yes, and? Of course, I appreciate your work on the gnus package. Gnus is wonderful, but even though you probably know a lot about gnus, not everybody else had the knowledge that the One True Mail&Newsreader had this ability to work around even insane borkenness. But please, let's stop before this evolves even deeper into a flame war (or even worse - a religious war about MUAs). -- Tollef Fog Heen Unix _IS_ user friendly... It's just selective about who its friends are.
