On 23-Apr-01, 18:52 (CDT), Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
> This would prevent the NMUers from doing things like debhelper/debconfizing
> packages without the maintainer's consent, as well as keep NMU bugs down.

NMUs should *never* change the build/install process to such an
extent.  NMUs are for fixing bugs in packages that are not being
maintained (perhaps temporarily, while maintainer is on vacation). Until
debhelper/debconf become required, such a substantial modification
should be prohibited.

This isn't a matter of oversight, simply common-sense.

If the package has been unmaintained for so long that one person is
effectively the full-time maintainer via NMUs, then they need to adopt
the package.

Steve
-- 
Steve Greenland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(Please do not CC me on mail sent to this list; I subscribe to and read
every list I post to.)


Reply via email to