On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 05:31:02PM -0500, Adam Heath wrote: > On Sat, 28 Apr 2001, Anthony Towns wrote: > > This is not correct. All packages have to follow current policy: if they > > miss out on most issues, that's a bug, if they miss some other issues, > > that's an RC bug. It doesn't matter what Standards-Version they claim. > Maybe dinstall should include a standards-version check when it installs a new > package?
No: it doesn't matter what standards-version they claim to adhere to. At all. That field is *NOTHING* more than a hint to -qa as to whether they might want to check up on a package and help the maintainer out with it. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``_Any_ increase in interface difficulty, in exchange for a benefit you do not understand, cannot perceive, or don't care about, is too much.'' -- John S. Novak, III (The Humblest Man on the Net)
pgpv29AZWw5WL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
