On Mon, Apr 30, 2001 at 11:27:46PM +0100, James Troup wrote: > Julian Gilbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > What I am suggesting is that katie has a list of such cases (although > > I'm not proposing a particular format): > > From my point of view, such information would ideally be: > > o not centrally controlled, but package/maintainer(s) controlled[0] > o trivial (both in terms of code and CPU use) for katie to obtain[1] > o not unnecessarily waste space in places it's not needed[2] > > I'd love to see suggestions that satisfy those criteria, but was > eventually someday going to fall back on something like Julian just > suggested if I couldn't find anything better.
The thought I had would be in the source paragraph of the control file, but that fails [2]. However, I really don't know how many packages we're talking about, and therefore whether it would actually be much of a problem. Julian -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Julian Gilbey, Dept of Maths, Queen Mary, Univ. of London Debian GNU/Linux Developer, see http://people.debian.org/~jdg Donate free food to the world's hungry: see http://www.thehungersite.com/