On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 04:12:12PM +0900, Tomohiro KUBOTA wrote: > According to the FAQ, a person (A) who translated a package into > a language will has a priviledge on the translation of the package. > I.e., if someone (B) wants to modify the translation, B needs A's > help for his/her translation to be finally adopted. A problem of > this policy is that if A has gone the project, nobody will be able > to modify the translation. Another problem is that leading translator > will continue to load the responsibility of the pakcage translation. > Fear of this continuing and growing responsibility can hesitate > translators to translate as many packages as possible.
Yes, I make the first translator like a owner of the translation. And since 2(?) weeks, only the first translator can upload a new translation. If a other translator send a changed translation to the server, it will send a mail to the first translator with the old and new translation and a diff. This is the first step of the BTS in the ddts. Now we have only the notification mail. In future the server will make this: - the translator must resende the package (maybe unchanges) or close the bug - If the translator don't send the bug back to the system in 4 weeks, he will remove as translator of this package and the bug submitter get a 'you can take over this package' mail - If the submitter don't take over the package, the server will put the description back in the pool again. Also can every coordinator change a translation on request. > I rather like a more dispersive equality model like CVS. In CVS, > every committer have equal right to commit their modifications. > We will think about committing priviledge control (account issuing) > to avoid attack to DDTS. I think the account issuing job should be > done by language cordinators. what is your opinion? Solve the above solution the problem? The server need a translator per description, it need a email address. If a maintainer change a description, the server will send a update mail to the translator. For it the server need the email address. > I only read the FAQ of DDTS. I have never experiened this situation. > Sorry if I misunderstand the FAQ. one thing to the ddts: The ddts is only at the beginning and I change daily the code. We have now only 60% of the ddts running. I have a long TODO list and some ideas for the future. If you have problems or improvements, please write a mail. Gruss Grisu -- Michael Bramer - a Debian Linux Developer http://www.debian.org PGP: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Linux Sysadmin -- Use Debian Linux Linux zu benutzen adelt nicht! Es bildet.
pgp47KEAFvFzO.pgp
Description: PGP signature