On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 03:36:32AM +0200, Wichert Akkerman wrote: > Previously Michael Bramer wrote: > > I am right and the translated description don't need be store in the > > status file? > > Yes and no. That is just a side-effect of a possible larger change.
Could you please explain what you're thinking about ? I am interessed in allowing end user having translation. I don't really care about the way it is done[*]. But with such a cryptic mail, it's hard to figure what can be done for my perticular problem in your much larger framework... I am willing to (try to) help, but it's hard without a decent information. I'm subscribed on -dpkg since months, and I did not see any related mail either. What do I have to do to be informed about dpkg development ? Bye, Mt. [*]: ie, I think gettext does what we need, but if you explain what's wrong about that, I'm pretty flexible.
