On 01-09-25 Steve Greenland wrote: > On 25-Sep-01, 03:12 (CDT), Christian Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > As I wrote in two emails before, this isn't a solution, since this > > forces an administrator to use kernel 2.4.x instead of maybe still using > > 2.2.x. > > I am so tired of hearing things like this. Nobody is forcing anyone to > do anything. We already "force" them to use 2.2 instead of still using > 2.0. You want the functionality, you use the right tools. You want to
Were exactly do we force them? Which debian packages do not work well with a 2.0.x kernel? > stick with 2.2, then *you* deal with the issues. The maintainers have That's a nice attitude, which will lead to the situation that people, especially administrators, will move away from debian to either other distributions, a bsd flavour or other free operating systems. Christian -- Debian Developer (http://www.debian.org) 1024/26CC7853 31E6 A8CA 68FC 284F 7D16 63EC A9E6 67FF 26CC 7853
pgpAWaw71repF.pgp
Description: PGP signature