Martin Michlmayr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20011229 12:59]: > > > We orphan ALL his packages, we get to know he is MIA and will not > > > > Oh, I think orphaning his packages can be a useful thing to do. But > > I just don't see why explicitly punting him helps. > > For the record, please note that while quite a few packages of > inactive developers have been orphaned already, no one has been asked > to leave the project for their inactivity (An inactive developer > without any packages doesn't do any harm anyway, and he might become > active again).
Quite right; that's as I think it should be, but I understood Gustavo Silva's message to suggest a change in that procedure.
