On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 03:56:06PM -0600, Michael Janssen wrote: > In Joerg Jaspert's email, 03-04-2002: > > Doug Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > > I suspect there will be enough people on both sides of this > > > issue. How about defaulting to non-verbose behavior, and having > > > a `-verbose' variant of all the BTS addresses (or even the > > > opposite). Then those who prefer to receive an acknowledgement > > > can mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] and so on... > > > > Other way: Let it verbose and everybody who dont want it writes to > > -nonverbose. > > So you dont break with the behavior it has now. > > I prefer this way too, but would rather the extension be the shorter > -quiet, which is much easier to remember and more standard than > -nonverbose. We could even shorten it as far as -q if it doesn't > conflict with something.
There's already a -quiet. It doesn't mean what you think it does :) I believe it doesn't send to -bugs-dist - don't ask me how it's different from -maintonly. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]