On Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 01:06:26AM +0200, martin f krafft wrote:
> because it will prevent s.d.o from serving a buggy package. it's not
> fixed perfectly, but at least it's not subject to a known exploit.

Could you be a little more careful with your terms? A DOS is not an
exploit, it's a DOS. By saying "exploit" your implying a far more
critical problem than actually exists.

-- 
Mike Stone

Attachment: pgpL2CRQktjKW.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to