Anthony Towns <aj@azure.humbug.org.au> writes: > ilisp > > These packages will get a brief chance to be reconsidered in the > next few days, but don't bet too heavily on them making it. From > this point on, packages that are still in testing that have serious, > grave or critical bugs that get removed probably won't get any > second chances.
As Will newton pointed out, this is a simple issue of a bug not getting closed out due to stupidity of the maintainer, which would be me. I did not intend to use the Closed: syntax in the changelog, but instead sent email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with close BUGID as described in my copy of bug-maint-mailcontrol.txt which I guess is out of date and I should have paid closer attention. I now know the correct interface for closing those bugs and have closed them. This should not happen again. I ask that ilisp be returned, if it has already been removed, because in fact the bug was fixed very quickly after it was reported and the bug only remained open due to my mistake, not due too any real instability the package introduced into woody. The CL community uses ILISP quite a bit and Debian is becoming a very popular platform for CL development so it would be pity if ILISP were not in woody because of my mistake dealing witht e bug database, and I would feel really bad 8^( -- Craig Brozefsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Free Software Sociopath(tm) http://www.red-bean.com/~craig Ask me about Common Lisp Enterprise Eggplants at Red Bean! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]