#include <hallo.h> Matt Zimmerman wrote on Wed Apr 10, 2002 um 09:31:12PM:
> > Well, no. :) idepci is known to fail for people with scsi and new ide > > hardware, so it's not really the best choice either. There probably is > > no best choice, but a system with a menu where you can choose a choice > > is probably better than any arbitrary default. > > I have installed many SCSI systems (including the one that I'm using right > now) with potato CD #1, which I assume has a similar configuration. I've Your assumption is WRONG. The old vanilla Flavor used there had lots of drivers. Idepci does not. > I absolutely agree that a choice on CD 1 would be superior, especially since > it would make it possible to have the choice of a 2.4 kernel while only > using one CD. But I think it would be even better to make a high-quality Yeah, highquality Debian distro, not installalbe on many modern systems. Gruss/Regards, Eduard. -- php ist an sich ne recht nutzlose sprache wenn da nicht soviele dinge so einfach drin moeglich waeren -- Getty in #debian.de -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]