On Mon, Apr 15, 2002 at 10:44:21AM +0100, Oliver Elphick wrote: > On Mon, 2002-04-15 at 09:49, Tille, Andreas wrote: > > http://ftp-master.debian.org/testing/update_excuses.html#postgresql : > > * postgresql (7.1.3-7 to 7.2.1-2) > > * Maintainer: Oliver Elphick > > * 12 days old (needed 5 days) > > * Valid candidate > > There is no link to programs it depends from which might be buggy. > > Seams I do not really understand update_excuses ... > The problem is that there are still packages in testing that depend on > libpgsql2.1.
No, the problem is that there are still packages in *unstable* that depend on libpgsql2.1; most have already been NMUed, but some of those NMUs didn't work and the packages remain broken on some architectures. If you look through update_excuses for things that say "Depends: <foo> postgresql" you'll find lots of examples. Renaming packages -- even renaming them back -- is bad, mmkay? Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``BAM! Science triumphs again!'' -- http://www.angryflower.com/vegeta.gif -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]