Le Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 01:32:19PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman a écrit: > On Sun, Aug 11, 2002 at 05:11:00PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~-> apt-cache policy icewm icewm-common > > icewm: > > Installed: (none) > > Candidate: 1.2.0-1 > > Version Table: > > 1.2.0-1 0 > > 500 http://debian.mirrors.easynet.fr sid/main Packages > > 999 file: ./ Packages > > icewm-common: > > Installed: (none) > > Candidate: 1.2.0-1 > > Version Table: > > 1.2.0-1 0 > > 500 http://debian.mirrors.easynet.fr sid/main Packages > > 999 file: ./ Packages > > It looks like you are providing the same package versions from both sources.
It's right. > Pins are used to select between distinct versions. Why can I specify a release pin instead a version pin ? I don't agree. > For packages with the > same version number (and thus should be identical), I believe apt will > select the one which comes from the source which is listed first in > sources.list. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~-> head -1 /etc/apt/sources.list deb file:/root/deb/ ./ then apt-get update (to be sure) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~-> apt-get install --print-uris icewm Reading Package Lists... Done Building Dependency Tree... Done The following extra packages will be installed: icewm-common The following NEW packages will be installed: icewm icewm-common 0 packages upgraded, 2 newly installed, 0 to remove and 8 not upgraded. Need to get 499kB of archives. After unpacking 2294kB will be used. Do you want to continue? [Y/n] 'http://debian.mirrors.easynet.fr/pool/main/i/icewm/icewm-common_1.2.0-1_i386.deb' icewm-common_1.2.0-1_i386.deb 238048 4959cbcaa274dd5ae9bb35144923538c 'http://debian.mirrors.easynet.fr/pool/main/i/icewm/icewm_1.2.0-1_i386.deb' icewm_1.2.0-1_i386.deb 260934 73f7800ef2f37da5f0a66819d397cd1e Identical :-( -- Julien Danjou .''`. Debian developer : :' : http://jdanjou.org `. `' http://people.debian.org/~acid `- GPG: 9A0D 5FD9 EB42 22F6 8974 C95C A462 B51E C2FE E5CD