On Aug 14, Laura Creighton wrote: > The new Python Business Forum (www.python-in-business.com) is
what is this? The link is dead. Is this the former PSA? Guido van Rossum writes: > > Now, if 2.3 won't be stable until well into next year (as opposed to > > the schedule in PEP 283), then we may want to target 2.2.x as our > > default version. > > Which version of PEP 283 are you referring to? It once had us release > the final version around the end of August. But the current version > says his: > > There is currently no defined schedule. We hope to do the final > release before the end of 2002, but if important projects below > are delayed, even that may be delayed. ok, fine. "hope to release ..." is a bit long. I'll prepare packages making 2.2 the default, introducing experimental 2.3 packages and drop 1.5. > To which I should probably add that that's the schedule for 2.3. If > things go as they went for 2.0, 2.1 and 2.2, there will be a 2.3.1 > bugfix update 3-6 months after 2.3 is released, and that would be the > first time I'd be comfortable calling 2.3 stable. which is why I wanted to make 2.2 the default for woody... we have a stable 2.2.1, which is not the default. Matthias