On Fri, Aug 16, 2002 at 09:59:28AM -0700, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > * Add a Conflict with the non-`c' version of the package. > > why can't we have both installed, just like the libfoo6 and libfoo6g > situation??
i explained this elsewhere... Why don't we put the libs in a different directory? Basically, it's too complex. For the glibc transition, we could do this because they used different dynamic linkers. Or can you think of a good way of having them both install without having conflicting files? -- Revolutions do not require corporate support.