On Sat, Aug 17, 2002 at 10:49:21AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote: > >> Gerhard Tonn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The disadvantage is that we must know all C++ packages in advance. > A large majority of C++ packages depend on libstdc++*; the ones that > doesn't are probably libraries which have been linked using cc instead > of c++. For example libsigc++-1.1-5 and libgtkmm1.3-14 would pass > unnoticed even if they are both C++ libraries. This *might be* > symptomatic of libtool libraries, counterexamples appreciated. In this > case you'd have to look for typical C++ symbols in the output of, say, > objdump -T, e.g. __pure_virtual, __dynamic_cast. In general you'd have > to look for traces of C++ mangling. It should be easy enough to find all the C++ libraries that need to be recompiled. First, find all the packages that depend on some version of libstdc++, and try to recompile them, libraries first. Then, out of the failed packages that have previously built successfully on our gcc-3.0 archs, grab out all library packages from the dependencies; sift and rebuild; lather, rinse, repeat. Anything that's missed by this process is either a package that requires manual intervention to get it working with gcc 3.x, or a package that has no dependencies on any other C++ packages. Steve Langasek postmodern programmer
pgpnSqiwpUmnp.pgp
Description: PGP signature
