On Sunday 18 August 2002 20:36, Chris Cheney wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 06:09:18PM +0200, Luca Barbieri wrote:
>> For example, how about calc.cx KDE 3.0 packages that are obviously >> necessary for any KDE user? I don't see any mention of GCC 3.2 on their >> text file so I assume that they aren't ported. > Why is KDE 3.0 obviously necessary for any KDE user? Not strictly necessary but it could be good :) My very very short list: getting back from Kde 2.3 (on Kondara) to Kde 2.2 was painful because 2.3 had... 1) Features Better CSS support in Konqueror Kmail allowed you to have fonts for all the headers Konqueror didn't break loading pages without an .htm or .html extension 2) Bugfixes Anti-alias didn't break down randomly (and in konsole as well) Font support didn't break down randomly giving you fonts you don't want Konsole (IIRC) didn't left "dirty spots" on the screen using anti-aliased fonts I admit that Debian Kde mantainer did a very good job, since this is the most stable install of Kde 2.2 I've ever seen (Kde 2.2's kicker from Mandrake did crash one day yes and the second too as well, forcing me to restart it via alt-f2). Anyway, that's only a list for which any kde user could appreciate a supplement of woody packages with the latest release of kde :), actually using Kde 2.2 is good enough. -- Davide Inglima - limaCAT "Mana is rapidly disappearing from the World, even the" "Mana Tree has begun to wither" - Seiken Densetsu 3 http://digilander.iol.it/nekochan/