On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 17:57, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, Luca Barbieri wrote: > > Both problems can be solved by simply writing the version scripts so > > that only a version tag is mentioned in each: > > libpng2.ver: > > LIBPNG_2.0 {global: png_*); > > > > libpng3.ver: > > LIBPNG_3.0 {global: png_*); > > > > However, we'll still get a warning message if versioned binaries are > > used with unversioned libraries. > > Not a problem. But, does this solves all the possible scenarios? > > Could you please write a wrap-up with all the scenarios (like Ultrich did), > and mentioning how the proposed solution would act, and how the system acts > now? > > We can then take this to the LSB, and see if we can all agree to do > something that all distros will accept. I did this in "A better solution for png/sasl/etc problems using versioned symbols". Is that enough? (the only significant flaw in that mail is that I forgot to explicitly mention that only programs must link with libraries in the /usr/lib/dev directory (that would be better named /usr/lib/novers)).
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part