Stephen Zander <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > What is the thinking behind always requiring libfoo-dev to depend on > libbar-dev when libfoo depends on libbar? I understand the need when > /usr/include/foo.h contains > > #include <bar.h> > > but if libfoo opaquely wraps libbar, why have libfoo-dev depend on > libbar-dev?
Do you have a case where theres no #include <bar.h>? Then you would
just build-depend on libbar-dev.
If it works 100% without there is no need to depend.
MfG
Goswin
