On Mon, 25 Nov 2002, Branden Robinson wrote:
> Neither. I was simply wondering if you felt free software in particular
> which is needed by a user of Debian had a stronger claim to inclusion in
> Debian than non-free software, even if also needed by a user of Debian.
>
> Because if you don't, it's misleading to say "free software" when one
> means just "software".
>
> Yes, I'm trying to draw you out about something. Gathering more
> anecdotes, one might say. ;-)
Clear statement here: I'm in favour of keeping non-free as is.
I like to support Debian users who just need non-free software.
On the other hand my opinion is this clear that I do not need to
waste my time in following this damn non-free discussion and I hope
that this thread will not be drawn in this direction.
Kind regards
Andreas.
