On Sun, 2003-04-20 at 12:16, Javier FernÃndez-Sanguino PeÃa wrote:
> Which, IMHO should be required by now. IMHO it's bad enough that dpkg does > not handle this itself (#155799 and, better, #187019). And even better than both of those, #155676.
On Sun, 2003-04-20 at 12:16, Javier FernÃndez-Sanguino PeÃa wrote:
> Which, IMHO should be required by now. IMHO it's bad enough that dpkg does > not handle this itself (#155799 and, better, #187019). And even better than both of those, #155676.