Em Thu, 22 May 2003 01:26:27 +0200, Bernd Eckenfels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escreveu:
> On Wed, May 21, 2003 at 11:55:36PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > It's much more helpful to write this as: > > yes of course, but the question is where the line between helpfulness and > usefulness is :) > > At least I think it is not a good idea to talk about "abuse" if maintainers > save themself some work. This might have the opposite effet than desired. That's *very* useful, too. And that would save people a lot of work when tracking problem causes, etc. It will not kill adding a few more details when closing a bug, and that makes the changelog much more useful. This is the way I do: * New upstream release - it seems like the loooong CC is not a problem anymore (Closes: #182003) - IMAP has gone through a lot of work, so I believe this should be fixed. Also, this version is supposed to fix the 'io blocking' thingy. (Closes: #164101) Damn, it evens helps the submitter to understand what problem has been fixed when he receives the notification. []s! -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Gustavo Noronha <http://people.debian.org/~kov> Debian: <http://www.debian.org> * <http://www.debian-br.org> Dúvidas sobre o Debian? Visite o Rau-Tu: http://rautu.cipsga.org.br