On Monday, Jun 16, 2003, at 11:04 US/Eastern, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
Which, of course, does not help with the situation he originally reported
(building a woody package on testing with a newer compiler than was
originally used). Time travel is still required there. :-)
Agreed. To fix Woody requires time travel. [Or the ftpmasters going insane.]
Now, if we changed sarge to use g++-c102 (as I briefly suggested), would that prevent this problem in sarge+1 or sarge+2 or whenever the ABI changes again?
