On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 16:18:49 +1000, Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:06, Manoj Srivastava wrote: >> > There is no excuse for this. Access to servers that are not in >> > spam lists is well available to Debian developers. I tunnel my >> > outgoing mail through a server in Melbourne no matter where I am, >> > this avoids all issues of spam blocking by IP address. I offered >> > accounts on a choice of machines to be used for such purposes for >> > any Debian developers who have no better options, but so far >> > no-one has taken me up on this offer. >> >> I refuse to allow spammers this victory. My machines are fully >> capable members of the internet, and I deliver my own email. My >> philosophy is that if people drop mail from me due to incompetence >> (since setting up machines to classify email from me as spam is >> indeed a misconfiguration), then I have no real desire to impose my >> musings on them. > If your machines are fully capable then they will have permanent IP > addresses and no spam ever coming from them. In which case they > will never get listed in a DNSBL (*) and there is nothing to be > concerned about. They are, when I send mail from home, or when I trael to the office. However, I often send mail from the road (or the internet cafe) where dhcp often rules. manoj -- "The only way for a reporter to look at a politician is down." H.L. Mencken Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> 1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C