Brian Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's pointless to go through this again. Instead, I'll offer a concrete > example of the confusion this can create (the original submitter asks > for clarification of how the bug was fixed): > > http://bugs.debian.org/188740
That's a documentation issue. debian/changelog is not the place for documenting random features. >> As I have said before, this is incomplete: only bugs that were reported >> and identified are listed, and redundant: these changes should be in >> the upstream changelog already. > > I don't see anything particularly helpful in the upstream changelog for > the above example. Please do not generalise the practice of individual upstream authors. -- Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 is out! ( http://www.debian.org/ ) Email: Herbert Xu ~{PmV>HI~} <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt